Our role in the police complaints system includes independently reviewing the way the NSW Police Force (NSWPF) handles complaints about serious misconduct and investigating particular areas of police practice, if it is in the public interest to do so. We check how police handle less serious complaints, and regularly audit the way their complaint-handling processes are working to ensure they are effective and comply with legislative requirements.
We work with police to make sure the complaints system appropriately identifies criminal and serious misconduct and is accessible, credible, flexible and responsive.
Ombudsman submission to the Review of Police Oversight by Mr Andrew Tink
On 24 June the Ombudsman provided a submission to Mr Andrew Tink for his Review of Police Oversight in NSW.
Our submission responds to the requirement for Mr Tink to provide advice about ‘options for a single civilian oversight model for police in NSW’. We examine the principles underpinning the current model and how it works in practice. We recommend that any proposed changes should be informed by a proper understanding of the benefits and risks associated with such a change. Our submission highlights the urgent need for new laws to remedy significant gaps in the current arrangements for oversighting police investigations into critical incidents and also explains the need to update complaint handling provisions in the Police Act 1990. Download our submission here.
Police use of Firearms Prohibition Order search powers
We are currently scrutinising police use of new search without warrant powers and are calling from submissions from the public.
In November 2013, amendments made to the Firearms Act 1996 provided police in New South Wales with new search powers to enforce a Firearms Prohibition Order (FPO). The new search powers allow police to search (without a warrant) any person subject to an FPO and any premises or vehicle that the person occupies, controls or manages. The powers were introduced to help police find firearms and related items (such as a firearm part or ammunition) that the person is prohibited from having. Police can conduct an FPO search at any time, as long as the search is ‘reasonably required’ to determine whether the person has committed an offence by using a firearm, or by acquiring or possessing a firearm, a firearm part or ammunition.
We have released an issues paper which provides information on police use of the FPO search powers in the first ten months of operation. Download our issues paper here.
We welcome your comments about the topics discussed in the paper and on any other aspects of the powers and their operation. In particular, we seek information about the personal experiences of people who have been directly affected by the FPO search powers. We have prepared a template to assist you in preparing your submission.
Download it here.
Submissions are due by 31 August 2015. Please send your submission to firstname.lastname@example.org
Police providing name and place of duty
Police officers are required to provide their name and place of duty when they exercise certain powers such as arrest and search. Changes introduced in November 2014 mean that, even where an officer fails to provide this information, their use of the power will still be valid in most circumstances. The Ombudsman commenced a review of police compliance with this requirement on 1 November 2014. We would like to hear your views and have published an information sheet to invite submissions. Download our invitation for public submissions here.
Use of the new consorting provisions by NSW Police
One of our roles is to review how new criminal laws are operating. One of these reviews is about new provisions that make it an indictable offence, punishable by up to three years imprisonment, to habitually consort with convicted offenders after being warned by police.
We are seeking your comment in relation to use of these provisions by NSW Police.
Download a fact sheet about our review of the new consorting provisions here.
Download our issues paper here. In it, we outline the main issues emerging from the use of the new consorting provisions in their first 12 months of operation
Submissions are due by 28 February 2014.
Please send them to email@example.com.
At the end of the review we will report our findings to the Attorney General and to the Commissioner of Police. The Attorney General will table our report in Parliament as soon as practicable after he receives it.
Investigation into allegations concerning officers of the NSW Police Force, NSW Crime Commission and Police Integrity Commission.
The Ombudsman has received and has been referred a significant number of complaints about the conduct of officers of the NSW Police Force, the NSW Crime Commission and the Police Integrity Commission in relation to a number of investigations, including Operations Mascot, Florida and associated matters. These complaints make allegations about a wide range of serious misconduct that has occurred over a significant period of time.
The Ombudsman has decided that it is in the public interest to directly and independently investigate these allegations. The investigation is to be identified as ‘Operation Prospect’.
Click here to access a fact sheet about Operation Prospect, or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org or by telephone 02 9286 1015.
- Face coverings and indentification final report - August 2013
- Consorting Issues Paper - Review of the use of the consorting provisions by the NSW Police Force - November 2013
- Fact sheet - review of the use of the consorting provisions - November 2013
- Tips for making a complaint
- How are Taser weapons used by NSW Police Force? October 2012